Join the conversation

...about what is working in our public schools.

If You Win the PR Battle Over School Reform, You Can Still Lose the War

vonzastrowc's picture

I'm getting more and more worried about the heated rhetoric of debates on school reform. This rhetoric is fueling a war without winners. Here's why:

The rhetoric of reform is killing the public school brand.
Too often, the rhetoric suggests that all public schools are schools of desperate measures, schools of last resort. The failing urban school has come to represent every public school. Some say public schools are impervious to reform. Others say they have capitulated to reform and become test prep factories. Public schools are battle grounds for ideologues of all stripes who attack them for straying from ideological visions of what is Good and Holy.

The message to parents of means? Get your kids out.

The rhetoric of reform is shrinking our vision for education.
The language of "high expectations" rings hollow when we consider just how little we expect of some reform models. The tests we use to measure our progress focus mostly on low-level skills. Subjects like world language are disappearing from the curriculum. Those who say tests don't measure everything that matters are sometimes derided as "touchy feely."

But visions that inspire us are by nature touchy feely. They push us to think well beyond our current impoverished measures. (Today, Jay Mathews praised a set of high schools that use long essays and projects to measure the progress of their mostly low-income students--and to very good effect. Vision can become reality.)

Our rhetoric will force us to lie in the narrow beds we have made for ourselves.
There's just so much sloganeering and spin on all sides right now. People who have cooler heads often sit on the sidelines and wait. The loudmouths and spin doctors will help The Cause, they seem to think, and reason will somehow prevail in the end after their team has gained political ground. So let's keep churning out the documentaries.

But that's just wishful thinking. By that time the tone will have become too poisonous, and the combatants will be tainted by all they have said and done. If the "winners" of the school reform war peddled miracle cures, they'll get mugged by reality. If they set themselves against all change, they'll get blamed for all the failures of the status quo (and not without reason).

And schools will be the losers.

 

We have to be clear-sighted about the big problems we face. (We do indeed face a crisis when poor children and children of color have such limited educational opportunities). But even if we're winning our PR battles, we risk losing the war.


Great piece, Claus, and spot

Great piece, Claus, and spot on. I just sang a similar tune in a quasi-movie review titled "What would Gandhi think of The Lottery?" Check it out at http://bit.ly/aV2Z4C -- and let's keep lobbying for less 2-dimensional debates on such an important set of issues.

Brilliant piece,

Brilliant piece, Claus--you've had a string of them lately. Perception is indeed reality, when it comes to public opinion on what was once our greatest national asset: free, good-quality public schools.

Did all children have those schools? No. But if we think that firing all the teachers and starting over is the way to ensure that they do, we are sadly mistaken. The scorched-earth policies proposed for "fixing" public schools (even those that don't need an overhaul) are being driven by the rhetoric you outline here.

How do we get past the media distortions? My take on this is that teachers need to find their voices, and speak from the heart and the classroom. There are more than 3 million K-12 teachers who live the realities of school every day. Teachers have been marginalized in this discourse--objects of reform, instead of partners in reform. http://snipurl.com/z80oy

Claus, I agree. And Diane

Claus, I agree. And Diane Ravitch is spot on. We need to stop the beatings, and then move to a framework where we can work together to come up with solutions.

And primarily, that is going to mean actually funding inner city schools. And funding schools in general. We need it! And it's the one thing that the private foundations are doing with charter schools that actually makes sense. They are funding them with boatloads of money!

One Green Dot school in LA received $15,000,000!!!!! Do you even KNOW what my colleagues and I could accomplish with even $15,000 to improve our department????

Sam--Thanks for your note.

Sam--Thanks for your note. Your very thoughtful take on the Lottery makes the point much better than I do. We need I and Thou relationships to flourish if we're really going to get anything done. I and It seems to be the order of the day.

Nancy--thanks for the very kind comment. I think it would be fascinating to do a poll of very accomplished teachers--National Board Certified Teachers; National Teachers of the Year--to see how they're reacting to the rhetoric of the current reform language. It would be eye-opening to test the theory that we're alienating the most accomplished teachers with the white-hot rhetoric.

Ken--I'd be particularly happy right now to see the $10 billion added to the supplemental stimulus go through. That won't even plug the enormous holes we have right now, but the prospect of reform amidst sudden austerity measures sure doesn't make me happy.

"Public schools are battle

"Public schools are battle grounds for ideologues of all stripes who attack them for straying from ideological visions of what is Good and Holy."

Yes, I should imagine so, if by "ideologue" one means "a person who objects to sex ed in elementary school" or "a person who objects to birth control being handed out by school nurses." There's a limit there somewhere, and it isn't *just* crossed in the 'hood.

But I think parents who see their roles disrespected by the schools or whose children have not been treated well are the ones more likely to pull their children. I don't think it has much to do with general news stories of things happening in other places; people talk with others in their own neighbourhood and figure out the real story about the local school (good or bad).

Do you really know anyone who has decided not to publicly educate his child because of an opinionated news story? IMO anyone that jumpy was on the fence to begin with.

God bless, Claus. I have enjoyed reading your posts of late. :)

Hello again, Mrs.

Hello again, Mrs. C.--Actually, by ideologue, I mean anyone who carries any strong ideology of any political stripe, and they come from left and right and go way beyond sex ed. in schools. "Good and Holy" in this sense was not meant to be religious only....)

Right now, public schools in many places are probably getting more kids from private schools, because the economy is driving parents to search out less expensive options. But I'm also meeting quite a few parents of means who have internalized the sense that public schools are schools of endless tests, poor performance, restructuring, chaos. Down the road, this could all have an impact...

True, Claus, but it could

True, Claus, but it could have a POSITIVE impact in that parents can lobby for the testing to be only a PART of the school evaluation process instead of a vast majority of what matters.

If in fact it's true that many parents are opting for public schools because they can't afford the private education costs, wouldn't that mean that you would now have (at least in theory) a more elite group of students attending? Test scores should go way up until the economy improves by this logic. For that matter, if public schools are generally as great as you'd like to make them out to be, these parents would just *love* to have their children stay because they'll have such great experiences. Of course. (Ok, it *could* happen.) :)

Maybe another post, but I also have to wonder if more expensive students (disabled or otherwise needy) get pushed out of school at a higher rate during lean times. I do see nasty comments about on the internet rather frequently deriding special needs kids for soaking up all the ps education money.

PS. I like your tabs and new layout. :)

But I'm also meeting quite a

But I'm also meeting quite a few parents of means who have internalized the sense that public schools are schools of endless tests, poor performance, restructuring, chaos.

Well, I couldn't agree more that this is going to become the perception as a whole. The thing is, however, that most parents won't feel that way about "their" neighborhood school because they've had dealings with it and can see that's not true. They'll feel that way about "other" schools, which many already do... Largely because they don't know what goes on in those schools. And in many places home values are tied to school district perceptions, so there is an in-built bias to prefer their schools over others.

But the testing... the testing they will see and they will hear about from their kids. And they will hear about it from their teacher friends at birthday parties and backyard BBQ's. And then they will wonder why on earth anyone needs to test their kids to death.

Then, the backlash. And when they've seen what the elite have done to "their" neighborhood schools to save "other" schools... Well, then that will get interesting.

Ravitch recently tweeted that it will take 10 years for the testing regimen to show it doesn't work.

But how long for the backlash? Particularly now that the NEA is taking up the charge with a vocal campaign against "deform"?

Who will parents believe? Their friends in the profession and their children's teacher's, or a politician in Washington with a 22% approval rating?

And I think this will all prove extremely damaging to the Democratic Party. They are not seeing how much the parents, teachers and administrators who are aware of all this really don't like what is going on.

And results, in time, will prove the shallowness of the testing regimen. How? Two ways:

1.) The NAEP scores will not be raised by teaching kids to teach to these tests. Particularly because, as Ravitch puts it, the learning environment in classrooms in response to these tests is inimical to real learning. And according to Ravitch, who helped create the NAEP for awhile, that exam tests genuine learning.

2.) International scores will not be raised either. If anything, they will actually go down. Reason? That international test is a thinking test. And these tests encourage rote memorization of basic facts using basic skills. When was the last time a person who could only use basic skills invented the next iPhone or the next new big thing people don't even know they need yet?

Third world countries have the market cornered on basic skills. We need to teach our children to think and to create. Virtually no one, in the USA in 2032, will make their living sewing buttons, making jeans, or building ikea furniture. In fact, virtually none do.

We are creating a disaster for our country. A generation of schoolchildren who have not been taught to think.

I appreciate this post very

I appreciate this post very much, Claus. I think that we truely need some Academic reforms. This is truely a timely post.

School should be a place

School should be a place where there is a slow pace of life, where everything is determened and the headmasters occupy their thoughts only with their students but not with different obstacles the school can meet. I do mot think that public schools are bad. Everything depends on the teachers. these are teachers that creat the atmosphere.

Instead of feeling

Instead of feeling disappointed by the failure of Proposition 19 that I'm more excited than ever about the prospects of cannabis should be legalized for adults. Proposition 19 was not rejected, as they sought to legalize marijuana. It was rightly rejected due to defects. We need a perfect explanation of the evils of the ban, along with a more viable proposition for legalizing cannabis. We need to piggyback the current system of selling alcohol and snuff. This will prevent the simple proposal, not to scare potential voters with fear of the unknown. All adults know how alcohol and snuff are sold to adults. Therefore, there is nothing to fear or unknown about the devil you know, compared to the devil they do not. I will be pushing harder than ever for the legalization of cannabis and we must all participate in the debate on how to present the plan to voters. This will be much more successful than random tax plan and possible Proposition 19 lawsuits have been initiated. Even as flawed as Proposition 19 was, I almost did. Now we know what does not and can focus on what will work. Keeping people of faith. The purpose of the prohibition of cannabis is closer than ever. Now is the time to form stronger groups abolished in all states in time for 2012. We need a joint effort across the country, all at the same time. Proposition 19 began the debate. Up to us to take the next step and the restoration of our civil liberties.

I appreciate this post very

I appreciate this post very much, Claus. I think that we truely need some Academic reforms. This is truely a timely post.

I would love to see some

I would love to see some media spin. If you support the coal industry you don't support children's brain development!
Orkut Scraps

Eine Krankenkasse

Eine Krankenkasse wechseln.
Wie die Private Unfallversicherung verglichen wird.
Den rechner private Krankenversicherung testen.

Indeed, the relentless

Indeed, the relentless prospecting for perverse effects may itself have a perverse effect; it is apt to make the reformer insufficiently alert to emerging dangers. More important, reformers must realize that it is impossible to guard in advance against all possible risks and dangers. The most thorough prospecting will miss out on some negative effects that will appear only as events unfold. This inability to foresee future trouble will strike us as less disturbing once we realize that we are similarly unable to think in advance of the remedial measures that may become available or that we may devise once trouble occurs.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options