Join the conversation

...about what is working in our public schools.

Twenty-Six Percent?

vonzastrowc's picture

According to a new report by Arizona’s conservative Goldwater Institute, Arizona’s high school students are woefully ignorant of U.S. history and civics. By now, we’re all used to these kinds of studies, but one finding in particular stopped me in my tracks: The researchers found that only 26 percent of students surveyed could identify George Washington as the nation’s first president.

Twenty-six percent? Can that really be true? That finding just seems hard to swallow—though the media have apparently swallowed it whole.

Don’t get me wrong. I certainly do not think American students’ knowledge of civics and history is nearly what it should be. A report by Common Core pointed to very troubling gaps in high school students’ knowledge. But even in that report, 73 percent of high school students could identify George Washington as the commander of the Continental Army during the American Revolution. If they knew that, they presumably also know he was our first president.

So what gives? Who were these students in the Arizona Study? How many were English Language Learners? How many took the telephone survey seriously? Are Arizona high school students that much more ignorant than students in the nation as a whole? Are the open response questions used by the Goldwater Institute that much more difficult than the multiple choice questions employed by Common Core?

A finding as alarming as that should really trigger some reexamination of the Goldwater Institute study’s methodology. If it is indeed true that a full three quarters of high school students cannot name our first president, then the decline of civics and history education is even more severe than I thought. All the more reason, then, to reevaluate accountability systems that focus primarily on basic skills.

We have long had ample cause to believe we should dramatically improve civics and history education. But the Arizona study reinforces another point entirely. Americans are apparently willing to believe any bad news, however severe, about the sorry state of education or American youth. If a new study proclaimed that ninety percent of American high school students cannot write their own names, or that ninety-five percent cannot tie their shoes, newspapers would probably run with it.

It is always challenging to strike the right balance between urgency that inspires decisive action and alarmism that breeds hopelessness and disengagement. I certainly hope surveys of student knowledge promote broad national commitment to civics and history.


Open response items are

Open response items are harder than multiple choice items so that can be the dfference between the Goldwater results and the common core result.

Also Arizona has a lot of ELL students who probably don't do phone surveys very well. the Goldwater institute says charters did better than publics and privates did better than charters and publics. It's also true that most low SES and ELL students are in normal public schools. Unlike most states, charters in Arizona have fewer low SES and ELL students than publics do. Privates have even less than charters, so that can be the reason for the differences.

Thanks for taking another

Thanks for taking another look at this story.

Just the fact that the results were divided into public, charter and private (and we didn't get to see exactly how much better the charter and private school samples did) makes me question the whole enterprise, let alone the sampling methodology. Ninety-five percent of the elementary school kids I taught could name the first president of the U.S. by 3rd grade. Unless they didn't speak English, of course.

Your analysis of the balance between stimulating the need to act and outright twisting of reality is right on. A steady diet of stories like this does not lead to thoughtful conversation about improving public education. The purpose of the story--and probably the "research"--was something else.

Thanks for your comment,

Thanks for your comment, Nancy.

As I understand the study, they did provide data for charter and private schools as well, and they found that charter school students did twice as well as publics, and privates did twice as well as charters. If Gary's claim that Arizona charters have fewer ELL students is true, that might account for part of the difference. Arizona privates presumably have fewer ELL students still.

Still, your experience of third graders seems more believable than the 26% figure. It would be interesting to ask teachers informally to determine how many of their students can name the first president. I can't shake my skepticism about the study's findings.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options