Touchy-Feely

Time Magazine's cover story about Michelle Rhee is lighting up the blogosphere. One particular passage from the story is attracting special attention:
“The thing that kills me about education is that it’s so touchy-feely,” she tells me one afternoon in her office. Then she raises her chin and does what I come to recognize as her standard imitation of people she doesn’t respect.... “People say, ‘Well, you know, test scores don’t take into account creativity and the love of learning,’” she says with a drippy, grating voice, lowering her eyelids halfway. Then she snaps back to herself. “I’m like, ‘You know what? I don’t give a crap.’ Don’t get me wrong. Creativity is good and whatever. But if the children don’t know how to read, I don’t care how creative you are. You’re not doing your job.”
This quotation clearly unsettles Core Knowledge blogger Robert Pondiscio, who counts himself a supporter of many reforms Rhee champions. He worries that her bare-knuckles manner will backfire, and he objects that good teachers are by definition "touchy-feely."
I share his concern, and I'll add another. Are we so sure champions of standardized test data are NOT touchy-feely? Do current standardized assessment systems really offer reliable, objective measures of student learning? Some researchers question the validity of widely-touted state test-score gains--in New York City, for example.
As Harvard assessment expert Daniel Koretz reminds us, state test results can be anything but straightforward.
Let's face it. Education remains a touchy-feely business, moreso than many of us would like. Business-minded reformers are hardly immune to this problem.
All the more reason to invest more time, energy and resources in much better accountability and assessment systems. That would do all of us--soft-hearted and hard-nosed alike--a world of good.
Image source: lavendergirl.com
SIGN UP
Visionaries
Click here to browse dozens of Public School Insights interviews with extraordinary education advocates, including:
- Duke Professor Helen Ladd
- Children's Literature Laureate Jon Scieszka
- Middle School Educators Carmen Macchia and Michael De Vito
The views expressed in this website's interviews do not necessarily represent those of the Learning First Alliance or its members.
New Stories
Featured Story

A School that Works for Children
Grove Patterson is 50 percent African-American, 37 percent white and 13 percent Latino, with 40 percent of students considered economically disadvantaged. The school offering a combination of nontraditional programs proven to support student achievement including an extended school day and year, data driven instruction and time for teacher collaobration. The school outperforms the state on average test results in almost every subject in every grade. Learn more...

School/District Characteristics
Hot Topics
Blog Roll
- Edwize
- School Board News (including BoardBuzz and the Leading Source)
- Legal Clips
- The EDifier
- Learning Forward’s PD Watch
- Advancing the Teaching Profession
- Principals' Office
- Principal's Policy Blog
- The Principal Difference
- ASCA Scene
- PDK Blog
- Always Something
- AASA's The Leading Edge
- AASA's School Street
- The Answer Sheet
- U.S. Department of Education Blog
- The Core Knowledge Blog
- This Week in Education
- PTA Blog
- Iste Connects
- Inside School Research
- Teacher Leadership Today
- Center on Education Policy
- On the Shoulders of Giants
- Teacher in a Strange Land
- Teach Moore
- The Tempered Radical
- TLN Teacher Voices
- The Educated Reporter
- The Character Education Partnership Blog
- Edutopia Blogs
- Center for Public Education
- Connect for Kids
- Once Upon a School



December 1, 2008 | Posted At:
December 1, 2008 | Posted At: 11:28 AM | Author: Alexander Russo | Category: Urban Ed
RHEE: "The Thing That Kills Me About Education Is That It's So Touchy-Feely."
It's hard to say anything new about DC's Michelle Rhee, and folks are going to have a field day with the TIME cover picture of Rhee using (on?) a broom (Can She Save Our Schools?).
But there there are in fact some things worth noting in this profile, including several lively anecdotes, the increasing involvement of Randi Weingarten in the DC negotiations, and Rhee's questions about Obama. And there are some great flame-thrower quotes from Rhee, of course:
"The thing that kills me about education is that it's so touchy-feely. People say, 'Well, you know, test scores don't take into account creativity and the love of learning.' I'm like, 'You know what? I don't give a crap.' Don't get me wrong. Creativity is good and whatever. But if the children don't know how to read, I don't care how creative you are. You're not doing your job."
http://scholasticadministrator.typepad.com/thisweekineducation/2008/12/r...
My main concern about this
My main concern about this article is that someone is giving credence to an adult who uses the term, "I don't give a crap." In my classroom, I would give a student, "10 seconds to rephrase that comment." A "flame thrower" is the perfect way to describe this comment.
KLKeene
I agree--the term did make me
I agree--the term did make me cringe a bit, too.
I think that if you have a
I think that if you have a love of learning, and you don't do well on tests, then the tests are probably not designed well. Tests should measure how much and how well a student has learned. If a students loves to learn, naturally, he/she will try to learn, and (if not handicapped) ultimately succeed.
I also find it... well, interesting... that politicians try to dissect and analyze test scores and education, and then legislate based on their conclusions without actually asking the students what we think about how accurate tests are. Sure, many answers will be immature and sarcastic, but there would be some honest ones. The actual students are a huge resource that is currently widely untapped.
And yes, I myself am a student in high school.
Post new comment