Throwing Out the Baby with the Bathwater

Read President Obama's budget, and you'll get the distinct sense that alternative certification works and staff development doesn't. The first of these gets a big shot in the arm, and the second (Title II) suffers a pretty big blow. Get the right people into the schools, the thinking seems to go, and the rest will sort itself out. But reality is more complicated than that. All roads will take us back to staff development.
Critics argue that federal staff development dollars haven't done much good, so why keep them flowing? Much better to funnel them into alternatives. The critics have a point, or maybe half a point. We haven't gotten enough bang for our federal buck, so it's tough to justify calls for more Title II money unless we can show that we will spend the money well. Of course, alt cert programs haven't yet proven their worth either, but they're newer, some are promising, and none carry the taint of "status quo."
But it would be very wrong to turn our backs on staff development because it has so often been botched in practice. Stephanie Hirsh of the National Staff Development Council offers another path. She recently worked with a teacher leader to craft a message to Arne Duncan. The upshot of that message: Direct Title II dollars more wisely.
First, they write, tie the use of funds to a much stronger definition of professional learning. (NSDC's definition has won widespread support.) Then set aside funds to help teacher leaders and principals learn how to "build and support collaborative learning teams and communities." Finally, require hard-nosed evaluation of the money's impact.
As we consider the fate of Title II dollars, we can draw an important lesson from the charter school debate. Good charter schools work, and bad ones don't. The same goes for staff development. The challenge, then, is to ensure that money supports quality. Any innovation, no matter how cool or sexy, will founder on poor implementation.
No school--and no teachers--will get very far without strong and sustained staff development. So let's not throw out the baby with the bathwater.
SIGN UP
Visionaries
Click here to browse dozens of Public School Insights interviews with extraordinary education advocates, including:
- Duke Professor Helen Ladd
- Children's Literature Laureate Jon Scieszka
- Middle School Educators Carmen Macchia and Michael De Vito
The views expressed in this website's interviews do not necessarily represent those of the Learning First Alliance or its members.
New Stories
Featured Story

A School that Works for Children
Grove Patterson is 50 percent African-American, 37 percent white and 13 percent Latino, with 40 percent of students considered economically disadvantaged. The school offering a combination of nontraditional programs proven to support student achievement including an extended school day and year, data driven instruction and time for teacher collaobration. The school outperforms the state on average test results in almost every subject in every grade. Learn more...

School/District Characteristics
Hot Topics
Blog Roll
- Edwize
- School Board News (including BoardBuzz and the Leading Source)
- Legal Clips
- The EDifier
- Learning Forward’s PD Watch
- Advancing the Teaching Profession
- Principals' Office
- Principal's Policy Blog
- The Principal Difference
- ASCA Scene
- PDK Blog
- Always Something
- AASA's The Leading Edge
- AASA's School Street
- The Answer Sheet
- U.S. Department of Education Blog
- The Core Knowledge Blog
- This Week in Education
- PTA Blog
- Iste Connects
- Inside School Research
- Teacher Leadership Today
- Center on Education Policy
- On the Shoulders of Giants
- Teacher in a Strange Land
- Teach Moore
- The Tempered Radical
- TLN Teacher Voices
- The Educated Reporter
- The Character Education Partnership Blog
- Edutopia Blogs
- Center for Public Education
- Connect for Kids
- Once Upon a School



But good charter schools
But good charter schools create the right environment for professional development. I don't care how hard you try but you're not going to get people to do professional development right unless you have the right climates and school leadership to begin with. That's why the system itself is in the way of professional development. Get schools into the hands of good charter operators and see professional development flourish. Leave them in the hands of public bureaucrats and see it croak.
And I guarantee you that teachers hate professional development more than anyone.
Anonymous, I'll agree with
Anonymous, I'll agree with you that good charters can create the right environment for p.d. By the same token, bad charters don't. Sounds a lot like traditional public schools. If charter authorizers are compelled and empowered to do their jobs well (as the Obama administration seems to want), strong pd will be part of a strong application. It's not "the system" that's in the way of good pd, it's incoherence in the system that stands against it. The challenge for policymakers is (1.) to understand what strong pd looks like and (2.) create policy structures that encourage it. Otherwise, whether in charters or traditional public schools, strong pd will be an accident rather than the rule. And if we believe charters are the only route to strong pd--which is patently not the case--then we're apparently content to ignore the 95% of public schools that aren't charters.
As for teachers hating pd.... I'm married to a teacher and a friend to many others, and I can tell you that they hate BAD pd. Strong pd, on the other hand, is a completely different story.
Cute baby. Anonymous needs to
Cute baby. Anonymous needs to look over to the right side of this page and click on "What's Working in Your School" if s/he needs evidence that many successful, highly challenged public schools have strong PD programs. Or read about Chets Creek Elementary in Jacksonville FL, a (non-charter) public school that not only models the best kind of PD but exports it via online seminars to nearby universities.
http://timmonstimes.blogspot.com/
Post new comment