Join the conversation

...about what is working in our public schools.

Taking the Easy Way Out

vonzastrowc's picture

Yesterday, education blogger Kevin Carey sharply rebuked people who peddle simplistic solutions to difficult problems schools face:

All of this would be merely aggravating if this kind of sad excuse for policy debate didn't have a real, detrimental impact on the lives of students. When you tell people that large problems can be solved with simplistic, nominally clever policy solutions, you're implicitly raising a question: "If it's so easy, why haven't we done it already?" That in turns breeds cynicism and mistrust, a jaded worldview in which large social problems are either fundamentally unsolvable or hostage to venal politicians who won't do the right thing even though the answer is so obvious that anyone with a lick of common sense can see it. And once you get there, the temptation is strong to throw up your hands and worry about something else.

Carey is scolding Tom Friedman for advocating the particularly silly idea that states could address the dropout problem by making driver's licenses contingent on high school graduation. But his comments have much broader resonance than that. Many in the national media have made a habit of portraying popular new reform ideas as sure-fire strategies for dramatic school improvement. People skeptical of those reforms must therefore be obstructionists and villains. As I've noted before, Jonathan Alter, Nicholas Kristof and David Brooks have pushed this storyline especially aggressively.

As Carey suggests, that story is very dangerous, because it breeds cynicism and disengagement. If we can't use the miracle cure, why then the situation is hopeless! There have been shades of this thinking in national op-eds and articles portraying high-profile reformers as the drop-dead last chance for urban schools. (See, for example, the Washington Post editorial page, which referred to Chancellor Rhee as the "best, perhaps last, hope" for DC Schools.) It's never wise to pin all our hopes on one reformer or a limited set of reform strategies, especially when research on solutions is sparse.

Carey reminds us that tough problems require complex solutions: "The high school dropout problem is serious business. We can do better, if we focus on improved funding, leadership, teachers, curriculum and assessments tied to high standards, alignment with higher education, integration of social services, virtual high schools, and many other things"-like professional development and public engagement. When solutions are so multifaceted, it's harder to tell tales about villains in the way of progress.

There's more than enough responsibility to go around.


I think the idea of having to

I think the idea of having to get high grades to get a driver's license is like getting a license to drink at 14 years old- just silly.
It is OUR JOB as teachers to stay on these kids and get the funding we need for programs or training to put quality curriculum into practice that reaches all of our students. It is also our jobs as teachers to know EACH INDIVIDUAL child and what their strengths and weaknesses are. Praise them and focus on their strengths while building some scaffolding for their weaknesses. Driver's license???

While I understand your

While I understand your objections--the driver's license idea would quickly create far more problems than in would solve--the underlying point seems to be that students greater motivation to stay in school. That principle seems quite sound--and it's the job of educators, families and communities to provide that motivation.

The driver's license idea is mostly a gimmick and a distraction--you're quite right.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options