School Reform – First Do No Harm
A new report, Democratic School Turnarounds: Pursuing Equity and Learning from Evidence, suggests that government agencies and policy-makers, including the U.S. Department of Education, should rely more on research to guide their efforts in school reform and turnaround strategies. The report, authored by Tina Trujillo at the University of California, Berkeley and Michelle Renee of the Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University, and produced by the National Education Policy Center (NEPC) at the University of Colorado, Boulder, asserts that research shows that the top-down, punitive reform efforts that are currently in vogue are ineffective and cause more harm than good in turning around troubled schools.
While the current administration’s efforts to improve troubled schools are well-meaning, the reform strategies mandated destabilize schools and exacerbate the problems troubled schools already exhibit of high staff turnover and frequent change in leadership. The administration’s efforts to turn around 5,000 of the nation’s lowest performing schools through creation of the federal School Improvement Grant program (SIG) channeled increased federal dollars into states and struggling schools under the condition that a narrow choice of strategies be implemented: turnaround, transformation, restart or closure. The report explains that the four SIG approaches are largely grounded in the firing and replacement of school staff – a process also known as churn. Research has shown that these change strategies do not work and actually recreate the conditions that cause school failure.
Because these schools are among the hardest to staff in our nation, the federally mandated approaches have an inherent logistical challenge—finding the better-qualified personnel to refill vacant slots in turnaround schools. As the authors point out, when a school is in crisis, it is damaging to remove the people who are committed to helping children learn. The report also asserts that the current approaches to school turnaround are almost always ineffective, weakening school systems, causing staff upheaval, crushing morale and leaving the schools with poor student performance.
What is missing from the federal turnaround directives is community engagement, which many experts consider critical for turnaround to succeed. The report’s authors further assert that it is extremely important to engage those most impacted by turnaround—families, community members and teachers in targeted schools because these groups are the biggest assets in improving education. Recent research links community organizing with more effective teacher recruitment and retention, improved curricula, increased equity in school funding systems and higher student achievement.
Finally, the report states first among its recommendations that increases be made in federal and state spending on public education because real change requires real investment. When communities of educators, parents, community and business leaders collaborate toward a common goal and have the resources necessary to support real change, public schooling and the community at large are improved. This report documents the research that supports this approach along with a companion brief that takes the report’s recommendations and offers legislative language that would translate the recommendations into law. Both the policy brief and the legislative brief can be found on the NECP website at http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/democratic-school-turnarounds
Since all of us who care about public education want our best efforts on improvement and “reform” to be based on evidence of success, this report offers an important guidepost for our collective efforts going forward in building a world class public school system that serves all our students and communities.
Image by Aran Ho Yeow Yong; vector by Mozillaman (Own work) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons
Click here to browse dozens of Public School Insights interviews with extraordinary education advocates, including:
- National PTA President Otha Thornton on the Common Core
- 2013 School Counselor of the Year Mindy Willard on the state of her profession
- Supervisor of Administration John Swang on saving money in energy costs
The views expressed in this website's interviews do not necessarily represent those of the Learning First Alliance or its members.
Every Student an Individual
Strong teacher commitment to rigorous, personalized instruction has lead to a higher graduation rate and greater participation in postsecondary learning opportunities for a racially and economically diverse New York high school. Learn more...
- ASCD Inservice
- AACTE's Ed Prep Matters
- ISTE Connects
- PTA's One Voice
- PDK Blog
- The EDifier
- School Board News Today
- Legal Clips
- Learning Forward’s PD Watch
- NAESP's Principals' Office
- NASSP's Principal's Policy Blog
- The Principal Difference
- ASCA Scene
- Always Something
- NSPRA: Social School Public Relations
- Transforming Learning
- AASA's The Leading Edge
- AASA Connects (formerly AASA's School Street)
- NEA Today
- Lily's Blackboard
What Else We're Reading
- DQC's The Flashlight
- Center for Teaching Quality
- The Answer Sheet
- Politics K-12
- U.S. Department of Education Blog
- John Wilson Unleashed
- The Core Knowledge Blog
- This Week in Education
- Inside School Research
- Teacher Leadership Today
- On the Shoulders of Giants
- Teacher in a Strange Land
- Teach Moore
- The Tempered Radical
- The Educated Reporter
- Taking Note
- Character Education Partnership Blog
- Why I Teach