The Paradox of Creativity in Education
All humans have the potential and ability to be creative, and we do ourselves a disservice when we refer to individuals such as Mozart and Einstein as the defining examples of creativity to which we should all strive to emulate. This genius bar misrepresents the concept of creativity and distracts us from the necessary conversations on how to foster the creative mindset and why it’s so important to include in conversations around education. According to James Kaufman, a psychologist and researcher at the University of Connecticut who presented last week at the Partnership for 21st Century Skills Summit, creative people are more likely to get promoted, be satisfied with their jobs, be in better physical health and be more resilient. Those are all outcomes we hope for our children.
Fostering creativity may have long-term positive benefits, so we should start focusing on creativity in the early years. According to the Quaglia Institute, as cited in the September 2013 issue of the American School Board Journal (ASBJ), there are eight conditions a student needs to fulfill “their academic, personal and social promise.” One of them just happens to be curiosity and creativity. If it’s an essential condition in a well-rounded education, where and when do we begin?
My first thought regarding creativity is that if we embrace it as a critical aspect of learning in schools, how we would do so in a way that doesn’t squash what we’re trying to achieve? How would we teach it? How do we steer clear of being prescriptive? It’s the paradox of creativity, according to Kaufman. It’s made even more challenging because creativity manifests itself in a wide range of domains. One can identify creativity in a person who comes up with a unique situational appropriate solution. Creativity can be infused into a process, by changing or doing something different than before, perhaps resulting in better outcomes. And, environment or atmospheres can themselves be creative. Furthermore, while creativity is often associated with big name theorists and innovators, it also takes place through the personal growth of an individual, or in the professional space in expertise that takes years to develop and refine. If we can identify all these opportunities where creativity may reside and how it might evolve, we can also recognize the challenge of teaching creativity.
In an era of accountability and measurement, it’s more difficult to imagine advocating subjects that can’t be easily measured. It seems more likely that we could end up creating all sorts of poor policy incentives out of a desire to ensure kids are prepared for adulthood in the 21st Century. Here’s a creative idea: maybe there’s a way we can foster creative thinking while simultaneously understanding we need new ways of measuring it that have nothing to do with standardized testing. If you can’t imagine that, maybe you’re in need of some creative encouragement.
Consider the possibilities in the “maker movement”, which was the focus of an article in the October issue of the Kappan, a PDK International publication. It’s described as a growing culture of hands-on making, creating, designing and innovating. And while there is understandably a tremendous amount of variety, the movement’s continuity rests in a shared commitment to creative ideas, and exploration of intrinsic interests. One particularly powerful approach is the presence of trained facilitators who perform two key roles: familiarizing individuals with available tools and asking the prompt: “What do you want to make today?” thereby helping children make whatever happens to be in their imagination. There is so much creativity in this format: conceptualizing a product, developing the process of creating something, being in a space where you can experiment and explore and enjoying a period of time during which you play to your strengths without being directly compared to or measured against your peers.
A final point: test scores show achievement gaps, and they highlight who falls behind and who succeeds. Tests frequently play to the strengths and capacity (or lack thereof) of those taking the tests. In contrast, if you examine children through the context of creativity, each has a pocket of strength, and those gaps that define our narrative around children failing or succeeding fall away. As educators, leaders and citizens, we should all celebrate and nurture those strengths as part of an educational experience that focuses on the whole person.
Click here to browse dozens of Public School Insights interviews with extraordinary education advocates, including:
- "Pinterest Queen"/Art Teacher Donna Staten on social media and lesson planning
- 2015 School Counselor of the Year Cory Notestine on the state of his profession
- GSU's Dr. Gwendolyn Benson on innovations in educator preparation
The views expressed in this website's interviews do not necessarily represent those of the Learning First Alliance or its members.
Keeping It Real: Preparing Students for College and Career
A Toledo public school is helping students see an immediate connection between their school work and their career interests. Learn more...
- ASCD Inservice
- AACTE's Ed Prep Matters
- ISTE Connects
- PTA's One Voice
- PDK Blog
- The EDifier
- Legal Clips
- Learning Forward’s PD Watch
- NAESP's Principals' Office
- NASSP's Principal's Policy Blog
- The Principal Difference
- ASCA Scene
- Always Something
- NSPRA: Social School Public Relations
- Transforming Learning
- AASA's The Leading Edge
- AASA Connects (formerly AASA's School Street)
- NEA Today
- Lily's Blackboard
What Else We're Reading
- DQC's The Flashlight
- Center for Teaching Quality
- The Answer Sheet
- Politics K-12
- U.S. Department of Education Blog
- John Wilson Unleashed
- The Core Knowledge Blog
- This Week in Education
- Inside School Research
- Teacher Leadership Today
- On the Shoulders of Giants
- Teacher in a Strange Land
- Teach Moore
- The Tempered Radical
- The Educated Reporter
- Taking Note
- Character Education Partnership Blog
- Why I Teach