Not Up to Standard

Remember the standards movement?
A must-read issue of the AFT's American Educator examines the nation's failure to make good on the
promise of "a well-aligned standards-based education system." Drawing on the AFT's latest review of state standards, the editors acknowledge improvements over the past decade but describe most state standards as "vague and repetitive."
What's more, they add weight to the argument that the standards movement has given way to its evil twin, the testing movement. Poorly written, narrow assessments too often take the place of well written standards, and they impoverish the taught curriculum.
The editors also note that recent reform efforts have seldom provided strong curricular materials, professional development tied to standards, or help for struggling students--all of which are critical elements of successful standards-based reform efforts.
The Learning First Alliance, which sponsors Public School Insights and includes the AFT, warned against the dangers of accountability on the cheap ages ago.
In any event, the new issue of American Educator is well worth your time. In addition to describing the general betrayal of the standards movement, it offers concrete examples of clear, specific standards from both states and organizations like Core Knowledge and the International Baccalaureate.
SIGN UP
Visionaries
Click here to browse dozens of Public School Insights interviews with extraordinary education advocates, including:
- 2013 Digital Principal Ryan Imbriale
- Best Selling Author Dan Ariely
- Family Engagement Expert Dr. Maria C. Paredes
The views expressed in this website's interviews do not necessarily represent those of the Learning First Alliance or its members.
New Stories
Featured Story

Excellence is the Standard
At Pierce County High School in rural southeast Georgia, the graduation rate has gone up 31% in seven years. Teachers describe their collaboration as the unifying factor that drives the school’s improvement. Learn more...
School/District Characteristics
Hot Topics
Blog Roll
Members' Blogs
- Transforming Learning
- The EDifier
- School Board News Today
- Legal Clips
- Learning Forward’s PD Watch
- NAESP's Principals' Office
- NASSP's Principal's Policy Blog
- The Principal Difference
- ASCA Scene
- PDK Blog
- Always Something
- NSPRA: Social School Public Relations
- AACTE's President's Perspective
- AASA's The Leading Edge
- AASA Connects (formerly AASA's School Street)
- NEA Today
- Angles on Education
- Lily's Blackboard
- PTA's One Voice
- ISTE Connects
What Else We're Reading
- Advancing the Teaching Profession
- Edwize
- The Answer Sheet
- Edutopia's Blogs
- Politics K-12
- U.S. Department of Education Blog
- John Wilson Unleashed
- The Core Knowledge Blog
- This Week in Education
- Inside School Research
- Teacher Leadership Today
- On the Shoulders of Giants
- Teacher in a Strange Land
- Teach Moore
- The Tempered Radical
- The Educated Reporter
- Taking Note
- Character Education Partnership Blog
- Why I Teach



The debate will continue...
Recent discussions about the state standards have brought up another dimension to the conversation - the expansion of standards to include civic and social-emotional/youth development outcomes. Although they might be harder to assess, many educators are beginning to push for broader and diverse assessments that go beyond reading and math. Further, there is an increased interest in thinking more critically about social studies and sciences as part of the core elements in our state standards and assessments. These new dimensions bring up potential technical questions of how to best develop open-ended questions and portfolios that would capture students¿ academic outcomes in a variety of subject areas and cognitive benchmarks. Additionally, there are concerns that states and districts might not have the financial means to pay for these more expensive assessment options. Finally, some teachers worry that there would not be sufficient or quality professional development opportunities to support such changes in standards and state assessments. With these and many other key questions not yet fully addressed in the education field, the debate on standards alignment and testing is likely to continue.
Post new comment