Join the conversation

...about what is working in our public schools.

Not Up to Standard

vonzastrowc's picture

Remember the standards movement?

A must-read issue of the AFT's American Educator examines the nation's failure to make good on theAmerican Educator promise of "a well-aligned standards-based education system."  Drawing on the AFT's latest review of state standards, the editors acknowledge improvements over the past decade but describe most state standards as "vague and repetitive."

What's more, they add weight to the argument that the standards movement has given way to its evil twin, the testing movement. Poorly written, narrow assessments too often take the place of well written standards, and they impoverish the taught curriculum.

The editors also note that recent reform efforts have seldom provided strong curricular materials, professional development tied to standards, or help for struggling students--all of which are critical elements of successful standards-based reform efforts.

The Learning First Alliance, which sponsors Public School Insights and includes the AFT, warned against the dangers of accountability on the cheap ages ago.  

In any event, the new issue of American Educator is well worth your time.  In addition to describing the general betrayal of the standards movement, it offers concrete examples of clear, specific standards from both states and organizations like Core Knowledge and the International Baccalaureate.  


The debate will continue...

Recent discussions about the state standards have brought up another dimension to the conversation - the expansion of standards to include civic and social-emotional/youth development outcomes. Although they might be harder to assess, many educators are beginning to push for broader and diverse assessments that go beyond reading and math. Further, there is an increased interest in thinking more critically about social studies and sciences as part of the core elements in our state standards and assessments. These new dimensions bring up potential technical questions of how to best develop open-ended questions and portfolios that would capture students¿ academic outcomes in a variety of subject areas and cognitive benchmarks. Additionally, there are concerns that states and districts might not have the financial means to pay for these more expensive assessment options. Finally, some teachers worry that there would not be sufficient or quality professional development opportunities to support such changes in standards and state assessments. With these and many other key questions not yet fully addressed in the education field, the debate on standards alignment and testing is likely to continue.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options