More Evidence There is No Silver Bullet
An article from November 6’s Indianapolis Business Journal recently caught my eye: It may be do or die for Indianapolis charter school. Bold title, but what shocked me was the second line, which began, “Knowledge Is Power Program (KIPP) College Preparatory School.”
This article was about a KIPP charter school that may not be reauthorized? But KIPP is the darling child of the education “reform” community, with a model that includes extended day and year coupled with extremely high expectations for students and staff. The Secretary of Education sings their praises, and they recently won an i3 grant from the Department of Education. What is going on here?
According to the article, this Indianapolis KIPP school has struggled. Now in its seventh year, the school is on its fifth leader. It has had considerable staff turnover (last year, 55%). It has had questionable financials, in one instance returning more than $8,000 in Title I funding that had been used improperly. There were at one point concerns about how the school upheld its special education files. And the school’s test scores reflect it all. The school is not performing well.
But there is hope, including recent improvements in test scores. Yet the question remains: is it enough to get the school reauthorized? I don't have the answer. It depends on a number of things, including the ultimate purpose of charter schools (there is an interesting debate on that in Rhode Island right now, by the way).
So why write about this? To call out a struggling school, embarrassing those who work hard at it every day? Absolutely not. To criticize KIPP in general? No way. The vast majority of their schools do not have these issues.
The point is to remind us, yet again, that there is no silver bullet. Branding a school as KIPP doesn’t mean it will perform well, just as lengthening the school day or year, dividing a large comprehensive high school into small schools or putting a school staff into professional learning communities doesn't mean a school will perform well. The structure of a school doesn't dictate its performance. The actions of those in and around the building, combined with a strong academic program and a supportive environment, do. And those are the things we should focus on in our efforts to improve our nation's struggling schools.
Click here to browse dozens of Public School Insights interviews with extraordinary education advocates, including:
- National PTA President Otha Thornton on the Common Core
- 2013 School Counselor of the Year Mindy Willard on the state of her profession
- Supervisor of Administration John Swang on saving money in energy costs
The views expressed in this website's interviews do not necessarily represent those of the Learning First Alliance or its members.
Every Student an Individual
Strong teacher commitment to rigorous, personalized instruction has lead to a higher graduation rate and greater participation in postsecondary learning opportunities for a racially and economically diverse New York high school. Learn more...
- ASCD Inservice
- AACTE's Ed Prep Matters
- ISTE Connects
- PTA's One Voice
- PDK Blog
- The EDifier
- School Board News Today
- Legal Clips
- Learning Forward’s PD Watch
- NAESP's Principals' Office
- NASSP's Principal's Policy Blog
- The Principal Difference
- ASCA Scene
- Always Something
- NSPRA: Social School Public Relations
- Transforming Learning
- AASA's The Leading Edge
- AASA Connects (formerly AASA's School Street)
- NEA Today
- Lily's Blackboard
What Else We're Reading
- DQC's The Flashlight
- Center for Teaching Quality
- The Answer Sheet
- Politics K-12
- U.S. Department of Education Blog
- John Wilson Unleashed
- The Core Knowledge Blog
- This Week in Education
- Inside School Research
- Teacher Leadership Today
- On the Shoulders of Giants
- Teacher in a Strange Land
- Teach Moore
- The Tempered Radical
- The Educated Reporter
- Taking Note
- Character Education Partnership Blog
- Why I Teach