Join the conversation

...about what is working in our public schools.

Is Literature Bad Medicine?

vonzastrowc's picture

A New York Times puff piece on reading workshops has ignited a firestorm in the blogosphere. Stop force-feeding kids the great books, the article implies. Let them read what they want to. Bloggers' reactions range from horror to approval.

I can understand the horror. When will children make the transition from Captain Underpants to Shakespeare, Twain or Hurston? What happens if we raise them to believe that reading should always be easy or fun? The most challenging books often offer the biggest rewards.

Perhaps there is a middle course. If children become enthusiastic about books they choose themselves, can teachers direct this enthusiasm toward more challenging books? Children's Literature Laureate John Scieszka seems to think so. (Or at least that's what he told me in an interview last year.)

Still, I can't help worrying about the apparently widespread belief that literature is just boring, that it has to be spooned into younger students like bad medicine. Sometimes children are just picking up on our own antipathies. Rafe Esquith makes his low-income fifth-graders passionate about Shakespeare, Twain and Steinbeck. It's not easy, but let's not give up trying.


You're right. It's not easy.

You're right. It's not easy. Just try to get a class of 7th graders to read To Kill a Mockingbird right off the bat. It's all good and well to sing the praises of the Great Books, but that doesn't do much of anything when the kids are unmotivated to read.

I teach 7th grade and use reading workshops all the time. They don't have to come at the expense of books in the prescribed curriculum. I let my kids choose what they want to read , but I also have them read the required books. It works well, but it requires the teacher to do a lot of work. I make sure I read the books kids voluntarily choose, and then I work to draw connections between those books and the required books. You have to give kids the first spark of enthusiasm and use that to kindle a bigger flame. Just forcing them to read the greats doesn't do them much good.

ReadingWorkshopper-- I think

ReadingWorkshopper--

I think we're in agreement. In my view, the problem with the New York Times story was that it presented reading workshops as some kind of miraculous answer to student reading issues: Just get them to choose their own books! Golly, who ever knew it was so easy?

Simply throwing the great books at children probably won't do. Your approach--give students some choice and see how it dovetails with required reading--makes a lot of sense.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options