Hiring Decisions and Teacher Quality

We have been hearing a lot recently about the importance of teacher evaluation in ensuring high-quality teachers in every classroom. We have been hearing a bit, though it seems to me much less, about the roles of teacher preparation and professional development in ensuring high-quality teachers in every classroom. But until very recently, we haven’t heard much about the role of hiring decisions in ensuring that high-quality teachers are in every classroom.
To me, it seems like kind of a “duh” statement. If you are serious about raising achievement substantially, you need teachers who can hit the ground running. And also, as has been made clear of late, it can be difficult – and costly – to get teachers out of the classroom once they get there.
But in the past, it seems that some districts have not always taken a close look at their new hires. According to a recent EdWeek article, teacher hiring in some districts typically consists of submitting a resume, passing a background check, and a review of transcripts and licensing test scores. The candidate is then placed in a pool for interviews. The article pointed to one district where the only thing they could say definitely about their hires is that they did not have a criminal record – a low (albeit important) bar for those trusted to educate the next generation.
We need to do better in getting quality individuals into our classrooms. And there are models of more robust hiring systems out there. For example, a recent Harvard Education Letter featured the hiring system at Uplift Education, a charter school network in Texas, that recently developed (with outside consultants) new hiring tools based on the characteristics of successful teachers in their network. They now use a multi-step interview process in which candidates are scored on how they align with 29 key characteristics. This year, the hiring process included a phone screening, teaching a model lesson, and an interview with school leaders. In the future, it will also include an exercise in which candidates must respond to hypothetical e-mails (for example, from a parent upset with a child’s progress reports) and one in which they must review student data and write an analysis.
Traditional school districts are taking similar steps. For example, District of Columbia Public Schools is overhauling its hiring process, which will now include an “error analysis” exercise that demonstrates pedagogical content knowledge and recordings of teacher auditions that will help principals decide which candidates to ask for interviews.
Of course, there is no sure fire way to tell who will make a great teacher. While researchers have studied a number of characteristics for impact on student achievement, they have found most are only weakly correlated. Still, these types of hiring systems seem an idea worth exploring.
There are some complications with implementing these hiring systems, though. One is the ever-present cost and capacity issue. These systems take resources that many districts may not have, especially once this year’s budgeting season is over.
And of course, these types of systems only really work when there is a surplus of teacher candidates attempting to enter the district – something that is not guaranteed in many areas, particularly some urban and rural communities.
Still, there are other ways that such districts can move towards more strategic hiring. Edweek points out that officials in Denver and Tulsa have moved hiring timelines to earlier in the year to help them get promising applicants committed. Officials in Pittsburgh are sending “recruitment ambassadors” to highly ranked education schools and stepping up recruitment efforts at a local university that has produced many successful district science teachers.
So while reconsidering hiring procedures may seem like a “duh” moment, there are definitely things we can do to ensure that the best of the best get into the classroom. And once they are there, we can dedicate our resources to making them even better.
Update: Two days after this blog was first posted, The Washington Post ran an article highlighting the District of Columbia's new hiring process.
SIGN UP
Visionaries
Click here to browse dozens of Public School Insights interviews with extraordinary education advocates, including:
- 2013 Digital Principal Ryan Imbriale
- Best Selling Author Dan Ariely
- Family Engagement Expert Dr. Maria C. Paredes
The views expressed in this website's interviews do not necessarily represent those of the Learning First Alliance or its members.
New Stories
Featured Story

Excellence is the Standard
At Pierce County High School in rural southeast Georgia, the graduation rate has gone up 31% in seven years. Teachers describe their collaboration as the unifying factor that drives the school’s improvement. Learn more...
School/District Characteristics
Hot Topics
Blog Roll
Members' Blogs
- Transforming Learning
- The EDifier
- School Board News Today
- Legal Clips
- Learning Forward’s PD Watch
- NAESP's Principals' Office
- NASSP's Principal's Policy Blog
- The Principal Difference
- ASCA Scene
- PDK Blog
- Always Something
- NSPRA: Social School Public Relations
- AACTE's President's Perspective
- AASA's The Leading Edge
- AASA Connects (formerly AASA's School Street)
- NEA Today
- Angles on Education
- Lily's Blackboard
- PTA's One Voice
- ISTE Connects
What Else We're Reading
- Advancing the Teaching Profession
- Edwize
- The Answer Sheet
- Edutopia's Blogs
- Politics K-12
- U.S. Department of Education Blog
- John Wilson Unleashed
- The Core Knowledge Blog
- This Week in Education
- Inside School Research
- Teacher Leadership Today
- On the Shoulders of Giants
- Teacher in a Strange Land
- Teach Moore
- The Tempered Radical
- The Educated Reporter
- Taking Note
- Character Education Partnership Blog
- Why I Teach



I am all for hiring well
I am all for hiring well qualified teachers, but let's be honest here:
even the greatest teachers in the world cannot be fully successful without administrators who recognize, support, encourage, and nurture their talents. Or perhaps, at the barest minimum... administrators who don't micromanage, mistrust, malign, and demoralize them.
Los Angeles Unified (and probably many other districts) seem to have adopted a policy of hiring inexperienced administrators who treat teachers (frequently the "good" ones)in a manner that can best be defined as bullying. We know that if we subjected our students to such negating treatments they would not succeed, so why is this harassment encouraged amongst administrators?
At the end of the day, you can hire the best teachers ever but if you don't allow them to use their talents, you may as well have hired a babysitting service.
Kinder Teacher - You are
Kinder Teacher - You are absolutely right. Without supportive and competent administrators, the best teachers will struggle. I think districts need to reevaluate how they hire administrators, too.
And this post isn't to say, by the way, that great teachers do not come into districts through current hiring practice. There are many, many great teachers in classrooms today - and many others who could be great if they had the administrative support and professional development that would help them get there. I just wanted to point out that we should not overlook this step in trying to improve teacher quality.
Ultimately, the main point is that we should not assume that we have a large number of sub par teachers that we need to "catch" with evaluation systems (which in some places seems to be the conversation that I am hearing). If we get the right teachers in the classroom in the first place, we can focus our attention elsewhere.
I think this has prob been
I think this has prob been TFA's best advancement in education...say what you will about the program itself, but their HR department/hiring process is vigorous and strong.
Teacher quality matters. In
Teacher quality matters. In fact, it is the most important school-related factor influencing student achievement. We live in an age of increasing inequality. While it's not fair to park the problem of global inequities at the doorstep of teachers unions, the continued floundering of public education in America is at least partly to blame: Education is an awfully good predictor of future earnings, and keeping bad teachers in classrooms filled with kids from poor families certainly helps to reinforce the cycle of poverty. The difference between a teacher in the 25th percentile (a very good teacher) and one at the 75th percentile (a not very good teacher) translates into a 10 percentile point difference in their students' test scores. After a string of good teachers or bad teachers, it's easy to see how you can end up with very wide gaps in student achievement. And this is all the more tragic since at least part of the answer—doing a better job of evaluating and selecting teachers—is readily at hand.
Los Angeles Unified (and
Los Angeles Unified (and probably many other districts) seem to have adopted a policy of hiring inexperienced administrators who treat teachers (frequently the "good" ones)in a manner that can best be defined as bullying. We know that if we subjected our students to such negating treatments they would not succeed, so why is this harassment encouraged amongst administrators?
I know that many teachers out
I know that many teachers out there are deeply committed to doing the best in the classroom, but the system is working against them. For example, they had to endure a leftist curriculum when they studied to become a teacher. And when they get out, they find that teachers' unions and the NEA are also far left.
Also, some of the effort in attracting high quality teachers has backfired. For example many states require teachers to have a 2.5 GPA in college rather than 2.0. Education departments responded by inflating their grades so much, that getting an education degree today is seen by many as a joke.
Post new comment