Does It Have to Be a Fight?
Like others in the media, David Brooks is composing an epic about a battle for Barack Obama's soul. It's the education "reformers" against the education "establishment." The good guys against the bad guys.
This may make for good copy, but it certainly doesn't help his readers come to grips with the complexity of challenges facing public education. (Indeed, Brooks himself doesn't always know what side he's on.)
Take, for example, the question of "merit pay for good teachers," which Brooks characterizes as a major weapon in the reformers' arsenal. The Quick and the Ed, a blog that has been nothing if not supportive of performance pay for teachers, just posted a long piece on the unreliability of the "value added" student performance measures central to most proposed performance pay systems. In other words, current measures of teacher quality offer an unstable foundation for teacher compensation decisions.
Should we therefore abandon the question? Of course not. But we should at least acknowledge that this reform, like most others, involves difficult tradeoffs and real risks. It is possible to have principled concerns about proposed reforms without treachery to the cause of reform in general.
Ironically, it's commentators like Brooks who may do long-term damage to the cause of reform. Too often, they imply that "reform" means doing anything radical, and doing it now. Just last week, former IBM CEO Lou Gerstner proposed abolishing local school districts. (Yeah. That oughta do it.)
The success of major reforms under discussion hinges on big investments in research and technology. Success also requires measured, constructive public conversation about costs and benefits. Commentators who fan the flames of conflict make such critical conversations all but impossible.
In the meantime, media accounts of education reform essentially ignore important work happening in districts like urban Atlanta or rural Cottage Grove, Oregon. Educators in Cottage Grove engaged their community in discussions about school improvement, overhauled the curriculum, and continuously enhanced teachers' skills. Student performance rose dramatically.
Yet those who would pit "the reformers" against "the establishment" don't have much time for reformers who deal in anything but governance or compensation structures. That's too bad, because they're missing a big part of the story.
Update: Blogger and author Dan Brown takes aim at what he calls Brooks' "facile, distorted representation of the state of education reform."
Update II: More Obama Drama. Newsweek's Jonathan Alter has published an article that essentially rehashes Brooks' morality play. Reformers vs. establishment, good guys vs. bad guys, etc. Yet Alter's contention that KIPP schools and their brethren supply the model for education all at-risk students draws a rebuke from none other than KIPP supporter Mike Petrilli.
Alter writes, "We know by now what works for at-risk kids. The challenge is trying to replicate it.” Petrilli responds:
Replicating these schools 1,000 or 10,000-fold is more than just a challenge. It might be impossible. Writing in the Gadfly a few weeks ago, Steven Wilson made the very good point that these “no excuses” schools tend to hire graduates from America’s top universities and work them to death. Neither part of that equation is “scalable.”
In addition, high attrition rates at many of those admittedly fine schools suggest that they are not the only answer to educating all at-risk children. Alter, like many other national journalists, presents decisions as more clear-cut, and solutions as far less multifaceted, than they really are.
In a related story, Alexander Russo challenges the national media to investigate common claims about various pretenders to the Secretary of Ed. position.
Click here to browse dozens of Public School Insights interviews with extraordinary education advocates, including:
- National PTA President Otha Thornton on the Common Core
- 2013 School Counselor of the Year Mindy Willard on the state of her profession
- Supervisor of Administration John Swang on saving money in energy costs
The views expressed in this website's interviews do not necessarily represent those of the Learning First Alliance or its members.
Every Student an Individual
Strong teacher commitment to rigorous, personalized instruction has lead to a higher graduation rate and greater participation in postsecondary learning opportunities for a racially and economically diverse New York high school. Learn more...
- ASCD Inservice
- AACTE's Ed Prep Matters
- ISTE Connects
- PTA's One Voice
- PDK Blog
- The EDifier
- School Board News Today
- Legal Clips
- Learning Forward’s PD Watch
- NAESP's Principals' Office
- NASSP's Principal's Policy Blog
- The Principal Difference
- ASCA Scene
- Always Something
- NSPRA: Social School Public Relations
- Transforming Learning
- AASA's The Leading Edge
- AASA Connects (formerly AASA's School Street)
- NEA Today
- Lily's Blackboard
What Else We're Reading
- DQC's The Flashlight
- Center for Teaching Quality
- The Answer Sheet
- Politics K-12
- U.S. Department of Education Blog
- John Wilson Unleashed
- The Core Knowledge Blog
- This Week in Education
- Inside School Research
- Teacher Leadership Today
- On the Shoulders of Giants
- Teacher in a Strange Land
- Teach Moore
- The Tempered Radical
- The Educated Reporter
- Taking Note
- Character Education Partnership Blog
- Why I Teach